Research Methodology
We evaluate trading platforms such as NV-Group using financial research, industry data and market analysis, applied through a repeatable framework.
Framework overview
Every platform is assessed across four layers — interface, risk, execution and reporting — and scored on five criteria within them. The same framework is applied to every environment we document, which makes our NV-Group review directly comparable with future reports.
Scoring criteria
- Accessibility and interface clarity
- Instrument breadth relative to typical retail strategies
- Cost transparency across spread, commission and financing
- Risk tooling: stops, margin visibility, exposure aggregation
- Documentation quality and disclosure completeness
Data inputs
Inputs include public platform documentation, published fee schedules, regulatory registers where applicable, third-party market data for volatility and spread context, and aggregated reader ratings submitted to our research desk. Reader ratings are reported as a count and average without editing.
What we deliberately exclude
We exclude affiliate performance data, undisclosed testimonial content, and any figure that cannot be traced to a public or reader-submitted source. We do not attempt to verify private account outcomes.
Limitations
Platform features, fees and instrument availability change frequently and differ by jurisdiction. Our research documents a point in time and should be verified against current official documentation before any decision. Ratings express editorial assessment, not a prediction of trading results.
Update cadence
Platform reports are re-checked every 30 days. Where a change alters a score, the page is republished with a new modified date and a short note on what changed.